2006-vitamins
B17 vitamins found in apricot kernels are outlawed

A vitamin seller was made a criminal - is that right? The Fate Of A Good Man

Photo caption: "All the stock confiscated in the raids on Jim Wright's property
was finally returned and dumped outside his front door by the MHRA in July 2007."
Preface: The Fate Of A Good Man
stock returned by the MHRA, July 2007
B17 vitamins found in apricot kernels are outlawed
 
 

January 2008

I can recommend a new book about medical freedom and Big Pharma, available online and entitled "The Fate Of A Good Man".
Clearly, the time has come for the promise of urgent regulatory reforms and a fresh look at the British judicial system. The author gives a chilling account of a long line of factors that have dehumanised British courts. He has a wonderful sense of humour, thank goodness. This one story, well told and with detailed references, could really help to transform the situation for the better - forever.

See below for ordering details, a comment from the Judge during sentencing, some of my correspondence and phone conversations with the MHRA resulting in the photograph above, plus a glorious quote - it is so funny.

Grace Filby
Churchill Fellow of 2007

"The fate of a good man" The Fate Of A Good Man - The Investigation, Prosecution and Trial of Jim Wright by the MHRA.


Author: Martin J Walker
Publisher: Slingshot Publications
Publication date: Dec 18, 2007

ISBN 978-0-9519646-8-2

Price : £5.00

At the moment this is an E-Book and can be purchased for download at £5.00

Page 71 of this new book addresses the financial aspects of the legal case and how much the lawyers stood to gain. Here is a quote from the court sentencing, for the record:

"Mr Wright stood to gain substantial amounts of money by taking advantage of vulnerable people."

Judge Thomas





Extract from previous correspondence from Grace Filby, Designs For Wellbeing to MHRA:

"On 16th December 2006 I asked the MHRA to please advise what they have done about Mr Wright's belongings - including his stock, private correspondence and customer contact details. Can the MHRA confirm categorically that they have respected those people's human rights  - 'without interference by public authority', and have the MHRA returned those confiscated items in a timely and responsible manner?


Is the MHRA aware that there are some other consequences of their organisation's huge underhand efforts and legal expense in trying to criminalise one individual?

e.g.

1. The additional nutritional value of natural fruits e.g. apricots and vitamins e.g. B17 is suddenly being brought to people's awareness.

2. Members of the public are being inspired to educate themselves from the wealth of evidence and testimonials online. 

3. The FSA/COT state officially that a safe intake is equivalent to one to two apricot kernels a day. "



ref: F.D.A docket
"Vitamin B17 is another case in point. B17 can cure some cancers but is outlawed for sale in the US. The only reason for it being outlawed is that it cannot be made by the Drug companies, or thus profited from."


  

Extract from "The Fate Of A Good Man" page 61:

The first question of the afternoon from Addison was again about B17. 'Can we finish this off?" he said. 'You took B17 off your website?'

'Yes.'


'You took it down because you knew it was dangerous?'


'No, I took it down because I knew it was dangerous to sell it.'


This was a very intelligent and quick-witted response from Wright, which summed up so much at the heart of the case.

I laughed lightly at this play on words, at which point, the judge's usher, sitting in front of me, turned and thrust out his arm violently, identifying me with his pointing finger and saying venonously, 'Shut up!'. This was the third time he had done this to me, and I was coming to the conclusion that he had some kind of behavioural disorder. I later thought that I might make a formal complaint against him, for what amounted in my mind to a mild form of assault. This authority assumed by the usher is just one more in a long line of factors that have dehumanised British courts. The 'public' is now considered a hindrance to justice and a threat to the security of the court. Of course, there are no reasons, rules or regulations to stop people laughing at jokes made by anyone in court, be they by defendant or judge, or even the inordinately unfunny Mr Addison.







This page was last modified:
Copyright © Designs For Wellbeing 2008